It seems as if the ‘motorist versus child on bike: who should give way?’ debate is becoming something of a monthly occurrence these days.
The first few weeks of November, for example, were dominated by the viral clip of a driver refusing to stop before narrowly passing an oncoming five-year-old cyclist, which sparked a hotly contested debate that made it all the way to Jeremy Vine’s Channel 5 show and the former Chancellor of the Exchequer (I know, who hasn’t been Chancellor lately?) Sajid Javid.
And then, a month later, another strikingly similar video popped up on the live blog, this time depicting a taxi driver ploughing straight ahead as a young cyclist passed… and on a school street too.
One of #Londonsfinest showing they have no Knowledge of how to pass kids safely and no Knowledge of what streets they are allowed to drive down. @azb2019@theJeremyVine@markandcharliepic.twitter.com/8obKBkAs8F
— Greg N (@n00dles71) November 30, 2022
And now, as we enter January’s sluggish middle section, and just like clockwork, we’ve been treated again to another round of viral video déjà vu.
Posting the following clip of a van driver and cyclist (with a child) narrowly passing each other on a London street made narrow by the two lines of parked cars, safe cycling campaigner Lauren asked: “Should the van have waited here and given the father and child more space? That would have been the safest thing to do.”
Should the van have waited here and given the father and child more space? 🤔 That would have been the safest thing to do. pic.twitter.com/358nfq78Vs
— Lauren O’Brien (@laurencyclist) January 12, 2023
The video has, inevitably, divided opinion – though this time even amongst cyclist themselves.
While several commenters were critical of the motorist’s driving…
Without a doubt yes.
One way to force this is to cycle further out, which he should do to be out of the door zone.
However this can lead to a game of chicken.— CycleGaz™ (@cyclegaz) January 12, 2023
Yes - the van had a gap to pull into.
— Dobbo76 (@Dobbo761) January 12, 2023
Who would be getting out of the way if I was driving my battered old Landrover down there? The van driver, because he’s required to wait. It’s only because the cyclist in front is a cyclist, that he barrels through. Shameful behaviour.
— CyclingMikey (@MikeyCycling) January 12, 2023
Yes, I faced exactly this situation this morning and took the primary position and at the last possible moment the van stopped ... should have stopped 50m earlier
— Richard Leeming (@RM_Leeming) January 12, 2023
… Others questioned the cyclist’s actions, or reckoned that the situation was well-negotiated by both:
TBF the cyclist looks like they had more space and opportunity to pull in and wait for the van.
— Andrew Porter @defsdoor [at] ruby.social (@defsdoor) January 12, 2023
No, there was plenty of space and it slowed and gave them more space.
— Simon Warren (@100Climbs) January 13, 2023
Personally, had I been a cyclist in this situation, I would have pulled into the what appears to be a reasonably large safe opening on the left. There doesn’t appear to be any quite large enough for the van to comfortably pull in. Van could have slowed a bit more though.
— Viva Les Vegas ٥٣٧ (@viva_les_vegas) January 13, 2023
No I think that’s fine
— Aidan Somerville (@somerville73) January 12, 2023
Why do Cyclists like to cause problems that don't exist https://t.co/yWBZ6zVPKh
— 🚴♀️🚴♀️ Jenny 🚴♀️🚴♀️ (@jen_moxon) January 12, 2023
Some, however, including Lauren herself, noted a separate, and perhaps more pertinent, in-built safety issue responsible for creating stand-offs like the one in the video:
Added question - is the problem here that actually there is too much parking available to cars? Should we really be giving cars this much availability to park in LDN?
— Lauren O’Brien (@laurencyclist) January 12, 2023
The city planners think they're being very clever by using cars to calm traffic in this way. As the vid demonstrates, it screws everyone else.
— Oliver Killick 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈💉 (@ollykilo) January 12, 2023
When you turn roads into car parks you put other road users at risk. Removing all the cars on one side of the street would solve the problem. https://t.co/e9IJwCbrxC
— Bill Majrowski (@BillMajrowski) January 12, 2023
Roads like this need one line of parked cars taking out and replacing with a safe, separate cycle lanes. No more stressful, life-or-death ‘negotiations’ like this, no more doorings for cyclists.
— Hoxton Low Traffic Neighbourhood - Needed! (@LTNHoxtonSt) January 13, 2023
This morning’s clip, featuring a cyclist and a van driver passing each other on a narrow street (which is one-way for motor vehicles and bidirectional for cyclists), has divided opinion in the comments as much as it did on Twitter.
Here’s a selection of some of our readers’ thoughts on the topic du jour:
mitsky: “I face this (without the child), as do most cyclists, on a daily basis. I don't mind if the driver is very slow/cautious but have reported ones who don't slow down or are aggressive/closer than I'm comfortable with.
“The way I look at this clip and most situations is: imagine the centre of the road have broken lines marking the two way lanes. In that case the driver of the vehicle that has to cross the line (due to the parked cars) needs to give way to the vehicle (cyclist) that doesn't.
“This can easily be seen to be the case here. Even without the lines on the road, the van driver is straddling the middle of the road. I appreciate that this case has been declared as one way and two directional for cyclists but the same principle should apply for safety.”
Awavey: “For me the cyclist has passed a better gap (whilst clearly aware of the oncoming van) that they would have been advised to use, then everyone is happy and passes no issue.
“This is one of those give and take situations I feel, and I can assure you I’m one of those riders who will ride at cars in prime and head on at drivers who refuse to yield and drive past gaps they could fit in these situations normally. This one I wouldn’t have.”
HarrogateSpa: “Apply the hierarchy of road users. The driver can do the greatest harm, so has the greatest responsibility to take care, and should cede priority.”
Secret_squirrel: “Video starts too late for full context, but from what we can see the van was already passing parked cars, so the initial decision to proceed or dive in seems to be on the cyclist. Hard to tell if the two gaps the van might have used were useful at all.
“My general feel is that both could have been more accommodating. Deffo nothing like as clear cut as the earlier viral incidents.”
Jimmy Ray Will: “I think the van is OK here. Both van and cyclist were well established in the road, so it’s hard to say if anyone had priority. Although, the cyclist isn't encroaching on the van's 'side' of the road and is the more vulnerable road user, so you would have to argue they are in the driving seat.
“However, both cyclist and van driver had opportunities to pull in. The cyclist had the first and more significant space to pull in to, but elected not to do so. That to me signals that the cyclist was comfortable with the space available and the van driver was OK to proceed as they did.”
Right, that’s it – I’m away for a quick blast on the turbo trainer (forgive me, Thibaut Pinot). Have a good weekend, everyone!
Starting Monday, we'll reveal which of the bikes, components, accessories & items of clothing we've reviewed over the past year are the absolute best. Here's what you can expect to see... https://t.co/zc8hcaQA62#cyclingpic.twitter.com/q6zlKmj7Ep
— road.cc (@roadcc) January 11, 2023
Well, that’s my weekend ruined.
The world mountain bike chariot racing championships – which is every bit as mad as it sounds – was set to take place tomorrow in its traditional home of Llanwrtyd Wells, the purported smallest town in Britain.
The annual championships, described by the organisers as “Ben Hur with mountain bikes”, see teams of two cyclists (usually in silly clothing) race around the town’s Manor Adventure Centre – all while dragging along their mate, sitting proudly in a special Roman-style chariot.
And if you don’t believe me, here’s a video of the 2021 event:
Brilliant.
Unfortunately, the organisers have been forced to cancel the championships this year due to a lack of entries and the prohibitive costs of running the event.
“Owing to a lack of people entering the chariot racing this weekend, it has become unviable for us to run the event, so regretfully it will not be taking place as advertised,” the Neuadd Arms Hotel, which helps run the event, posted on its Facebook page.
“This also applies to the toga party in the evening as well.”
Now I’m really annoyed.
The organisers continued: “We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause if people have made arrangements, but we can't afford to run events at a loss in the current economic circumstances.”
Hopefully, the championships will return, in all their mad Roman glory, in 2024. They better – as I promised Dan we’d enter a road.cc team…
I got asked at my talk @Active_ATA if the council supports #Kidicalmass and if they help us get the word out.
The answer is "no"; the ride was deemed 'political' and therefore removed from the council's climate and biodiversity festival 🤔https://t.co/S0rSjkfNKe
— Saskia Heijltjes - @saskia [at] toot.community">saskia [at] toot.community (@SaskiaHeijltjes) January 12, 2023
Saskia Heijltjes, who was appointed in October 2021 as Bath’s first bicycle mayor, claimed this week that Bath and North East Somerset Council removed a Kidical Mass ride from a climate festival last Autumn because it was deemed a “political” event.
Heijltjes tweeted yesterday that she was asked during a talk at the University of Westminster’s Active Travel Academy if the local authority supported and helped promote Kidical Mass, which sees families ride together to campaign for safe streets.
“The answer is ‘no’,” she wrote. “The ride was deemed ‘political’ and therefore removed from the council's Climate and Biodiversity festival.”
Apparently!
— Saskia Heijltjes - @saskia [at] toot.community">saskia [at] toot.community (@SaskiaHeijltjes) January 12, 2023
As Heijltjes notes, a Kidical Mass ride was originally slated to form part of the festival in late September and early October, advertised by the council as a “collaborative programme of events that showcase, inspire and connect organisations, residents and communities across Bath and North East Somerset”.
However, it was later removed by the organisers because, Kidical Mass says, “it is considered a political event” and policed under the category of “protests and marches”.
Kidical Mass Bath, on the other hand, say they are “an apolitical, community-led campaign, and will continue to demand the council deliver what they promised for residents.”
This just means that they are being challenged on Active Travel and it makes them feel uncomfortable. If they were supportive and encouraging they wouldn't see Kiddical Mass Rides in this light. Afterall they have cross party support. @allpartycycling
— Richard M (@Richard16878535) January 12, 2023
Banksy has turned his attention to active travel, it seems... (Or should that be SaxoBanksy? I'll get my coat.)
Cyclist James, who captured these images of the new sign (compete with expertly positioned googly eyes), hopes it will help to improve the attitudes of motorists in the South Gloucestershire town, especially after he was on the receiving end of this shockingly close overtake – while dressed as Santa, I may add – on the approach to that very roundabout last month:
North Somerset Council has been 'making waves' with new road markings on Clevedon seafront 🌊😅
What do you make of them? 🤷
📸: Save Our Seafront pic.twitter.com/yCK0wAxRom
— The RAC (@TheRAC_UK) January 10, 2023
The ongoing work to improve active travel in the Somerset seaside town of Clevedon has once again made the headlines this week, with the new one-way street for motor vehicles along the promenade – featuring “wobbly lines” designed to reduce speed – ridiculed in the national press for turning the town into “Balamory from hell”.
North Somerset Council’s plans to improve Hill Road and The Beach in Clevedon include the creation of a bidirectional cycle lane, new cycle parking provision, widening the pavement along the seafront, and building parklets outside cafés.
However, the scheme, which is currently close to completion and received majority support following a public consultation, has been the subject of a long, high-profile campaign, led by Tory MP and former cabinet minister Liam Fox, aiming to see it scrapped.
The current backlash against the new road layout on the seafront – which has been converted to a one-way street to allow for the installation of the bike lane – has seen its wavy lines labelled a “driving lane for drink drivers”, while others have dubbed it “ridiculous” and a “snake lane”.
North Somerset Council says the wavy lines are “a design feature to reduce the potential abuse of parking at these locations and help make the road feel narrower, which is a technique used to slow traffic speeds.”
“A wavy line provides uncertainty to the driver and is proven to help reduce unwanted parking,” a council spokesperson said.
Nevertheless, the storm in an antiquated tea cup has allowed the opponents of the scheme to renew their campaign with a fresh wave of petitions claiming the unusual layout will make the seafront more dangerous and harm businesses.
> Controversial cycle lane roadworks blamed for “killing Christmas trade”
“A vast amount of public money is being spent to solve a problem which does not actually exist,” says local MP Fox about a road on which a cyclist sustained critical injuries in a collision involving a driver in September 2020.
“We do not have major road safety issues on Clevedon seafront at present, despite it being a Victorian amenity. We will, however, have safety issues in the future as a result of the incompetent plans of the current North Somerset Council.
“The project is not popular, not safe, not affordable, not properly consulted upon and not necessary. It damages historic amenity, will disadvantage visitors, especially the elderly, will disrupt local trade and impede access to local residents.”
While safety, access, and local trade are all at the top of Mr Fox’s priorities, somebody needs to tell his party, who used the controversial wavy lines to indulge in a spot of anti-cycling bingo concerning the apparent danger posed to children by “high speed lycra clad cyclists”:
Yesterday saw the start of the most anticipated competition of the year (and no, I don’t mean the road.cc Recommends awards) – the Official Live Blog Flooded Cycleway Cup!
On Thursday’s blog, Dunham Massey in Trafford, Greater Manchester, made a strong start, roaring ahead with no fewer than three underwater sections.
But it faces stiff competition from Bristol’s infamous ‘Lawrence Hill Lido’ (put forward by road.cc reader hawkinspeter), which was in the news last week for its spectacular Olympic swimming pool-like depths, the result of a damaged pipe caused by, the council says, a tree root ingress.
But what about an outsider like the NCN 6 in Northampton? A victim of regular flooding when the adjacent River Nene is high, reader Martin Baker reckons it could go all the way.
Of course, the season is still young, and there are plenty of flooded cycleways for us to wade through before we crown a river- I mean winner…
Keep sending us your local favourites!
Dear @BrittanyFerries I’m just wondering how you justify charging £75 to carry a push bike from Portsmouth to Santander. Can we expect a valet service? 😉
— lee craigie (@leecraigie_) January 12, 2023
‘Ow much?
According to former pro mountain biker and Active Nation commissioner for Scotland Lee Craigie, Brittany Ferries did at least get back to her, with what could charitably be described as a load of old cobblers.
“Like most major transport companies today our pricing changes with demand and so naturally during peak periods, or on sailings where demand increases, our prices can vary,” the company said.
“There are several factors that need to be taken into consideration when different passenger types travel on a ferry and there is an additional fee for a bicycle over a foot passenger fare.
“For instance, cyclists have a separate check-in and route through port, requiring different facilities than foot passengers.
“Once on board, garage space is allocated for bicycles, reducing the space for other vehicle types, and there is a member of crew who will be assigned to directing and safely storing the bicycles for transit, which of course takes additional time over a foot passenger or even a car.”
Of course…
Translation, we have a monopoly on this route so will do what we want. 🤬
— NickityNackered🔴🚴♂️⚽️🏏🇿🇦🇬🇧 (@goonercyclist) January 12, 2023
LOL . . . . A crew member 'points' at a railing, cyclists then locks bike to said railing . . . . that's it !!! Remind me never to travel with Brittany Ferries @BrittanyFerries
— cycletothesea (@cycletothesea) January 13, 2023
An entertaining load of @&£@?#% from @BrittanyFerries… https://t.co/xSVnk2sM25
— Shivaji Shiva (@ShivajiShivaLaw) January 12, 2023
Gardaí in Dublin city centre carried out an operation earlier this week targeting cyclists jumping red lights and riding without front and rear lights – and issued fines to 16 cyclists in the process.
A tweet from An Garda Síochána’s traffic team said that the operation was about “ensuring the safety of all vulnerable road users”.
Gardaí nationwide work day-to-day ensuring the safety of all vulnerable road users.
Kilmainham & Kevin Street Gardaí on patrol in Dublin City Centre last night issued fines to 16 cyclists for breaking a red light or not having front/rear bike lighting.#SaferRoadspic.twitter.com/kC4LFTuXlv
— An Garda Síochána (@GardaTraffic) January 11, 2023
As Sticky Bottle pointed out, just before Christmas it emerged that only 71 drivers had been convicted in 2022 of dangerously overtaking a cyclist.
Needless to say – just like a similar cyclist-targeting operation carried out by the Met in Hackney last year – the Gardaí’s attempt to protect vulnerable road users divided those on Twitter:
Waiting to see your tweet where you catch drivers dangerously passing cyclists.
— Pauric (@pward82) January 12, 2023
Can ye do something like this but for cars??? 4 cars went through a red light the morning as I was trying to cross at the green pedestrian crossing… fine because I can see but if I was blind I was fucked 🥲
— Dearbhla Duff (@DearbhlaDuff) January 11, 2023
When a cyclist reported a driver who close-passed her you said:
"You don't know if the driver's having a bad day".
— Adespoto (@Adespoto3) January 11, 2023
While on my bike in a protected cycle lane, a car mounted the kerb and ran me over.
Got all their details and witness details and once out of the hospital went to the gardai"Sure what do you want us to do, you have their insurance"
Gardai - taking the lazy route
— Colm Malone (@pandaflop1) January 11, 2023
I have every sympathy for cyclists negotiating city traffic but they have to realise the the rules of the road apply to them also. Particularly that red means stop.
— Michael Rooney (@mikejrooney) January 11, 2023
Great, plenty more to be prosecuted !!
— Padraig McGowan (@PadraigMcGowan) January 11, 2023
Long overdue..Cyclists seem to totally ignore red lights. If they use the roads they need to obey the rules
— T.Max🏴☠️ (@TinaMax8) January 11, 2023
Of course cyclists can do wrong.
But you have to look at what's the greatest risk on our roads.
Ask yourself this, how many people did cyclists kill in Ireland in 2022?
Now,how many people did motorists kill in the same period?
We must deal with the greatest risk as priority
— Cycling In Kilkenny 🇮🇪🇪🇺 (@Cabaal) January 11, 2023
> Police in Hackney catch 18 red light jumping cyclists in 90 minutes
G’s Ride to Survive 🥵🤣 https://t.co/NEDY8Wk6Nc
— Geraint Thomas (@GeraintThomas86) January 12, 2023
Well, at least it would still be better than ‘Tour de Force’ or something like that…
It’s fair to say that Thibaut Pinot’s announcement yesterday that he plans to retire at the end of 2023 has sent the cycling world into a period of mourning.
And it’s easy to see why. Throughout the 2010s – a decade dominated by the relentless, robotic rhythms of the Sky train in the grand tours – Pinot stood out as one of the sport’s great, lost romantics who, like the French heroes of the increasingly distant past, raced on feel and with (dare I say it) panache. And who, most importantly, appeared human.
> Thibaut Pinot announces he will retire from cycling at the end of 2023
That caricature of Pinot as cycling’s last romantic (and, despite all the teary abandons and photos with his goats, it is still a caricature) stems from the Groupama-FDJ rider’s striking relatability and understand that there’s life beyond racing your bike – something underlined by his plans for the future, as told to L'Équipe in their cover story on the 32-year-old’s retirement.
Front page news in France #Pinotpic.twitter.com/gwG3LOhCmS
— Peter Cossins (@petercossins) January 13, 2023
“The first thing I’ll sell is the turbo trainer,” Pinot told the newspaper. Very relatable.
“Cycling’s taken up a third of my life,” he continued. “I want to focus on my other passion – animals and nature. I’ve always wanted to use what nature gives us to make things, honey, grow fruit and vegetables. I’ll open a guesthouse. Do some trail running & cross-country skiing, which’ll help my hyperactivity.”
On the way to victory on the Tourmalet at the 2019 Tour (A.S.O./Thomas Maheux)
Reflecting on his dramatic abandon at the 2019 Tour de France, when he appeared on the cusp of ending his country’s then-34-year drought at their home grand tour, Pinot once again illustrates why he’s not Chris Froome, or Tadej Pogačar.
“If I’m able to live the life I dream of, it’s also because I didn’t win the 2019 Tour,” he says.
“My life would have changed too much, which is why I have no regrets. I never wanted to have the life of a champion. I would have become a public figure, really famous, and I didn’t want that.”
Thibaut Pinot 🇫🇷 …2022 ➡️ 2024 👋😘🐐 pic.twitter.com/fMsEFl6YAP
— Pro Cycling Trumps (@procycletrumps) January 13, 2023
While Groupama-FDJ boss Marc Madiot – in typical Madiot fashion – reckons Pinot’s 2019 Tour was his “unfinished symphony”, the Tour of Lombardy winner’s main goal for 2023 will swell the heart of every cycling romantic: the Giro d’Italia.
“Even though I've only raced it twice, the Giro is the most beautiful race for me. I can’t finish my Giro story with an abandon in an ambulance,” he says.
A love for the Giro and a hatred of turbo trainers? Again, a man after my own heart.
While Pinot’s announcement this week has prompted fans and the media to reflect on a cycling life less ordinary, I’m sure there’ll be plenty of drama, goat photos, and battered car panels left to nourish our romantic urges throughout 2023…
My morning ride on the new 1.25 Million pounds cycle lane ……😳😳😳@Sustrans did you help design this and and give advice ? How much did you receive for this monstrosity? pic.twitter.com/RsfcEU5YhC
— Ediz (@ediz1975) January 11, 2023
To be fair, I’m not sure all the parked cars were included in Sustrans’ designs for the recently opened cycle lane in Enfield…
Part 2 pic.twitter.com/1QSQ5ym6UP
— Ediz (@ediz1975) January 11, 2023