One of the many factors that have made Tom Pidcock such a firm fan favourite in recent years, along with his demon-like descending abilities, is his multi-disciplinary approach and inherent love of racing, regardless of the terrain.
Whether it’s the spring classics, the grand tours, cyclocross, or mountain biking, Pidcock just loves to race his bike, all year round.
While the 24-year-old belongs to a generation of multi-discipliners who have eschewed the specialism of by-gone eras, Pidcock’s Ineos Grenadiers team – a squad whose reputation was built on a laser-like focus on success at the Tour de France, and barely anywhere else – appears to still have one foot in the past.
At least that’s according to Pidcock himself, who told the latest episode of the Red Bull Just Ride podcast at a mountain bike World Cup event in Mont-Sainte-Anne that his varied approach to racing is what makes him the all-round, exciting rider he is – despite coming under pressure from his own Ineos team to turn all his attention towards three weeks in July.
[Thomas Maheux, SWpix.com]
“Maybe I need to specialise in one discipline if I want to win the Tour, but I know that you’ll get the best out of me when I’m happy and when I’m enjoying it. Which is why I love other disciplines,” the Strade Bianche winner and world mountain bike cross-country champion said.
“Of course I want to win the Tour de France one day but the patience and preparation is massive.
“There is the element [of pressure from the team] and I knew that when I committed long term to the team. I also want it, but in my own way. I want to achieve all the things I believe I can achieve.
“Right now, I’m not ready to win the Tour de France next year yet. There has to be more steps where I achieve things in different disciplines and achieving them makes me a better rider.”
Hmm… Meetings at the Ineos winter camp could be interesting this year.
Although, with Dave Brailsford set for a role at Sir Jim’s not-really-a-revolution at Manchester United, Ineos may well have to adapt to a whole new multi-disciplinary approach…
Cofidis pro Wesley Kreder has confirmed that he is retiring from cycling at the age of 32 after suffering a heart attack at the end of August.
The 32-year-old Dutchman, who joined the French team from Intermarché-Wanty this year, experienced myocarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle, on the night of 28 August. His wife and in-law provided first aid before taking him to a hospital in Eindhoven, where he remained under observation for several days.
In a statement released last month, Kreder said that was “so happy to be alive”.
And now, after delaying a decision on his future until he was fully recovered, the 32-year-old – whose career-best results include stage wins at the ZLM Tour and Tour de Vendée – confirmed this week that he was leaving the sport.
“After the heart attack I had, I told myself that I could come back to the high level and race. But my doctor assured me that the best and wisest solution was to stop,” he said in a statement released by Cofidis.
“I know the sacrifices and the level of fitness necessary to perform at the highest level and it is not compatible with what I had.
“The decision was not easy to make but when I look at my children, my family, I know that I did what had to be done. I had a good career, I want to remember the positive. I will now spend time with my children and my wife, enjoying the joys of life as a family. I want to wait a bit before looking for a job.
“I hope that through my story, people will say that the best lesson is that life is too short not to love it. And I will try to benefit from it too.”
A valuable domestique, Kreder turned professional with Vacansoleil in 2013, before spending six years, over two stints, at Intermarché-Wanty, who he rejoined in 2017 after a two-year spell with Roompot Oranje.
He made his grand tour debut at the 2021 Giro d’Italia with Intermarché, and also rode the Vuelta later that year. After joining Cofidis at the start of 2022, Kreder returned to the Giro and became a key part of the French team’s classics squad.
Do you ever wonder to yourself, in a quiet hour, what the Canadian Mounties mean when they say that “pedestrian safety is a two-way street”?
Well, according to a road safety video released by the Richmond branch of Canada’s national police service and swiftly gaining online notoriety, that “two-way street” means equating a motorist checking his phone for an extended period of time, completely oblivious to what’s going on ahead of him on the road, with… wait for it – someone using a light-controlled pedestrian crossing.
Pedestrian safety is a two-way street. What pedestrians and drivers can do to make our roadways safer https://t.co/ifQhF3eMqUpic.twitter.com/UsdvxrM0aE
— Richmond RCMP (@RichmondRCMP) October 13, 2023
But, but, but, she had her earphones in and was wearing black clothes, of course, making her – the clip appears to imply – equally culpable had our texting and driving friend struck her as she minded her own business and, you know, neglected to break any laws.
Needless to say, the Mounties’ maple-flavoured slice of victim blaming has been roundly condemned on the ol’ interweb.
> Reaction as Transport for London pauses See their Side ad campaign following backlash
“Perhaps the worst road safety advert I’ve ever seen and by god I’ve seen some shit,” psychologist (all the psychologists on the live blog today) and road safety expert Dr Ian Walker wrote bluntly.
“Only one person is breaking the law in this video,” Stormont Cyclist added.
“Films like this give the green light for lawyers to proclaim ‘but she was wearing headphones and not paying attention’,” argued Eric, while Jorge said “it’s insane it got greenlighted”.
“Next from the safety experts: ‘Why deaf residents should not be allowed outside’”, wrote infrastructure campaigner Andy Boenau.
And, naturally, cycling’s phone-driving expert Cycling Mikey weighed in with: “Your focus is wrong and ill-guided. You need to police drivers if you want road safety.”
While another social media user summed the whole thing up: “Canada, what happened?”
What do you reckon, has Richmond’s ‘texting and driving = wearing earphones’ video finally topped Transport for London’s ill-fated ‘See their Side’ advert on the list of terribly advised road safety campaigns?
Following the massive backlash that greeted their questionable (to put it charitably) video on pedestrian road safety, which to many appeared to draw a false equivalence between distracted driving and using a pedestrian crossing, Richmond RCMP have now issued a statement concerning the “extremely disheartening” online response, claiming that the campaign was “not about X being more right than Y”.
“Every year we put out a media release on pedestrian safety, roughly at this time of year. We offer tips for sharing the road for both the pedestrian/cyclist and the motorist, Cpl. Dennis Hwang, Richmond’s comms officer, said in a statement.
“This year is the first year we decided to make a video. The video was conceived in-house and a student with a gift for film graciously donated his time and his skillset. The people in the video were volunteers.
“This was a positive experience for us, but the response to it has been extremely disheartening. The purpose of the video is to reduce harm, save lives, and create awareness. Full stop. Nothing more and certainly, nothing less.
“The video is not about X being more than right than Y. That is not its purpose.
“We have investigated many, many pedestrian and cyclist collisions throughout the years. They can be gruesome. They can take their toll mentally on everyone involved. Many of them are entirely preventable.”
"Removing barriers will lead to an increase of illegal use and antisocial behaviour."💬
This is one of the most common concerns we get when removing restrictive barriers on the National Cycle Network. But did you know removing barriers can actually have the opposite effect? 👇🧵 pic.twitter.com/OcFM6ffDuA— Sustrans (@Sustrans) October 17, 2023
With the inclusivity, or otherwise, of entrances to cycling and walking routes in the news lately – especially after a Worcester cyclist branded the gates on one of the city’s shared-use paths “an utter shambles and not at all inclusive”– active travel charity Sustrans today challenged the frequently cited myth that “removing barriers will lead to an increase of illegal use and anti-social behaviour”.
While Sustrans says that claim “is one of the most common concerns we get when removing restrictive barriers on the National Cycle Network”, the organisation instead noted on a social media thread that taking away these non-inclusive obstructions can “actually have the opposite effect”:
In our experience, restrictive barriers often stop people with wheelchairs, adapted cycles, prams, and trailers from using the path, but don’t actually prevent those with motorbikes or mopeds from illegally accessing it.
Motorbikes can often be wheeled under, around, or lifted above barriers and if people with motorbikes are really determined to get on the path they will just find an access point further up.
So, barriers aren’t effective, but how does making access easier for everyone help?
Removing barriers means that more people can use routes, making them busier, which can in turn make illegal use and antisocial behaviour less likely.
In a trial in London, barrier removal led to a 20 percent increase in path users and a reduction in anti-social behaviour.
This creates a positive feedback loop: people are more likely to use safe paths, so as a route gains a reputation for being safe, the number of people using the route goes up, making illegal use and antisocial behaviour less likely.
It’s a win-win.
Remember Road Safety GB’s mandatory helmet poll from last week’s blog, the one that saw cyclists accuse the organisation of framing the question in a “dangerous” manner, of ignoring the “real” sources of danger for vulnerable road users, and of “non-evidence-based victim blaming”?
Well, the results are in…
> Road safety group runs mandatory cycling helmets poll... 85% reject proposal
Here at road.cc, we’ve always known that riding a bike can lead to great environmental, health, safety, social, and political benefits – and now a group of academics have helpfully confirmed our long-held suspicions.
A new study titled ‘Orientation towards the common good in cities: The role of individual urban mobility behaviour’, undertaken by psychology researchers at the University of Hagen in Germany and published in the Journal of Environmental Psychology, examined the relationships between mobility behaviour – in other words, what method of transport you use – and political participation, social participation in organisations, neighbourhood solidarity, and neighbourly helpfulness, four facets of what the authors describe as “orientation towards the common good”.
According to the study, “a pronounced focus on the common good” is considered an essential component of social cohesion and is associated with the wellbeing of residents across diverse communities and multiple social levels.
However, the researchers point out that little has been previously known about the conditions or factors that promote the common good, or how citizens themselves can create it.
Likewise, while cycling is associated with many positive psychological variables, little is known about how it affects the common good.
> Researcher recommends cycling to work to try and match Amazon tribe’s unparalleled heart health
By analysing surveys between 2014 and 2019 of a representative sample of the German population, the researchers found that, in urban environments, “cycling rather than driving was positively associated with orientation towards the common good in all models” and that riding a bike “was the only variable that was a significant positive predictor for all four facets of orientation towards the common good after controlling for possibly confounding variables (home ownership, personal income, education, sex).”
They argue that while the interactions motorists and car passengers have with their direct environments are “significantly reduced”, cyclists on the other hand “directly experience the breadth of social diversity and cultural heterogeneity that make up urban life and cannot escape these impressions due to sensory density”.
This direct experience of the environment around them, the authors say, “leads to a stronger emotional bond between people and their neighbourhood” and therefore can lead to them participating in civic activities and politics.
In other words, riding a bike – and the interactions and emotional connection you have with the people, communities, societies, and things around you while cycling – can make you a more responsible, engaged citizen and neighbour.
The “relative isolation” of driving, meanwhile, can “reinforce individualistic behaviours and cause drivers to neglect collective actions”.
Thus, the authors concluded that mobility behaviour is indeed “associated with the orientation towards the common good”, findings which they say are “significant for policy and planning because the benefits of cycling over driving are more profound and sustainable than previously thought”.
Quick, someone get Rishi on the phone…
Alright, hands up – who else read that headline to the tune of the 1994 hit by Shampoo? Just me? Okay…
Anyway, the temperatures are dropped, the streets are tinged with orange, and the nights are drawing in – so we’ve collated five cool things that we’re reviewing on road.cc to help you enjoy your autumn riding:
Well, we always knew he was good against the clock, but 2017 Giro d’Italia winner Tom Dumoulin proved at the weekend that he can also put in a pretty rapid time when the TT bike’s locked away in the shed.
Highlighting that retirement doesn’t necessarily have to mean relaxing on the beach or gorging takeaways, the 32-year-old Dutchman took part in Sunday’s Amsterdam half-marathon, finishing it in an impressive 1:10.04.
Dumoulin’s pretty rapid run won’t come as a surprise to avid readers of the live blog – back in late 2021, the three-time Tour de France stage winner finished second at the Groene Loper Run in his hometown of Maastricht, covering the 10km in a blistering time of 32:38, just 17 seconds behind the winner.
Describing his first half marathon as a “really cool experience”, Tom said that was initially “aimed for a time below 1.15, but I found a nice group going slightly faster.”
Simples, really.
“Now I think I’ll not be able to walk for two weeks though,” he concluded, proving that he may well be human after all.
Agora foi @yveslampaert correndo 5km para 19:36” no cross country
Bom também pic.twitter.com/fGC2weISMZ
— O País Do Ciclismo (@opaisdociclismo) October 16, 2023
Dumoulin wasn’t the only Tour de France stage winner swapping his cleats for some trainers at the weekend – Soudal Quick-Step’s Yves Lampaert also participated in a local cross-country race in Belgium, covering a grassy and muddy 5km in 19.36.
Whatever happened to cyclists chilling in the off-season?
Tom Dumoulin’s foray into post-retirement half-marathons and Yves Lampaert’s cross-country brand of ‘relaxation’ has got us thinking about other pro cyclists fond of donning their running shoes during the off-season.
Last November, Mathieu van der Poel stormed to the win at his first cyclocross race of the season in Hulst, before casually slipping on his trainers for a 7km ‘tempo celebration run’, which he completed in just under 27 minutes. So much for a casual warm down…
However, that post-race jog wasn’t quite as ‘quick’ as MVDP’s ‘cross rival Tom Pidcock, who famously wound up the entire running community by uploading a post claiming to have run a 13:26 5km, just five seconds slower than the British record.
The greatest running achievement by a pro cyclist of all time, or a just a simple case of a dodgy GPS? I’ll let you decide…
But while cyclocrossers tend to incorporate running into their training – those bikes aren’t going to shoulder themselves – even some of the peloton’s road-only contingent have displayed some serious running chops during the colder months.
A week before Dumoulin almost stole the win at his hometown 10k with a blistering time of 32:38 in November 2021, Adam Yates clocked a sub-three-hour effort at the Barcelona Marathon straight “off the beach”. Alright Yatesy, no showing off now.
Even cycling’s most romantic (now-retired) icon Thibaut Pinot is occasionally fond of leaving the bike aside for a nice early morning run in the Seychelles:
Maybe there were some goats around?
Meanwhile, any running-cycling crossover can’t be complete without the inclusion of former road racer-turned-gravel pro Freddy Ovett, the son of Olympic-winning middle distance runner Steve, and friend of marathon icon Eliud Kipchoge (who also, it turns out, likes to go for a spin on his bike).
In 2021, Ovett proved he inherited some of his father’s running legs too, clocking an impressive 2:48.55 at the Los Angeles Marathon (sorry, Adam…).
Of course, it would be remiss of us if we neglected to mention the single greatest cyclist running moment of all time.
Cue the Benny Hill theme…
Visma-Lease a Bike. Wonder where they got the inspiration.... pic.twitter.com/k4rOa8PnhW
— Bolletjestrui (@Bolletjestrui) October 16, 2023
Ah, it’s all starting to make sense now…
> Catchy… Jumbo-Visma set to become Visma-Lease a Bike in 2024
Does this mean we can expect more bike swap chaos and shenanigans at next year’s Tour, as part of some elaborate sponsor plug? Pog certainly hopes so, anyway…
We’re sticking with Canada on the site this morning for some more un-bear-ably tense footage, this time involving a hungry grizzly and a rather startled cyclist… (you can blame Dan for that tortured pun.)
> “Pretty crazy” moment grizzly bear charges just past cyclist
But remember, as Richmond police will tell you, Cyclist/Bear safety is a two-way street…