The Sunday Times has claimed that new figures revealing that the number of people riding bikes on England’s roads has dropped represents a “victory” for motorists “in their long-running battle with cyclists.”
The assertion is made in the opening paragraph of an article citing Sport England’s latest annual Active Lives survey that highlights a shift in the pattern of where people cycle for leisure or sport, with a rise in indoor cycling thanks to the growth of platforms such as Zwift.
Opening his article, Sunday Times social affairs editor Nicholas Hellen wrote: “Motorists have scored a victory in their long-running battle with cyclists, as official figures reveal a 355,000 drop in the number of regular leisure and commuter riders on the roads in 12 months.”
The piece – which is behind a paywall, but can be read for free upon registration, which allows readers to access two articles a week – goes on to say that “Deterred by potholes, accidents and abuse from motorists, enthusiasts are retreating indoors, preferring to avoid the tensions of public roads by switching to virtual rides.”
We’ll be taking a closer look at the data from the Active Lives survey, and its implications, in a separate article here on road.cc.
But what jumps out from the Sunday Times article is the inflammatory and divisive language used, and in particular the premise that motorists and cyclists are two entirely distinct sets of people.
It’s something often claimed by some sections of the media – see, for example, the title of the 2012 BBC programme, The War On Britian’s Roads– but one that does not stand up to closer scrutiny.
Consumer research consistently shows that regular cyclists are more likely than the general population to hold a driving licence, and to live in a multiple car-owning household. Many motorists cycle.
The Sunday Times article naturally references Lord Winston and his campaign against cyclists and – we suppose for balance – the broadcaster and cycle commuter, Jeremy Vine.
Our Near Miss of the Day series amply demonstrates that many motorists have a reckless disregard for the safety of people on two wheels with whom they share the road and, at times, the intimidation is clearly intentional.
But to imply that two tribes exist and are at war with each other at one and the same time ignores that many people will choose the mode of transport most suited to the particular journey they are undertaking, and pours fuel on the fire of a conflict that is largely media-driven, and casts someone on a bike in the role of “the other” – as research from Australia recently found.
And that risks causing some motorists to view cyclists as the “enemy” – as any number of social media posts attest.
The fact is that most of us – whether on a bike, or behind the wheel of a car – simply want to get from A to B safely and without drama.
Riding a bike among motor traffic on any road in the UK will expose the cyclist to poor driving that underlines how vulnerable you can feel against two tonnes of metal, without the protection of seatbelts or airbags.
Attempts to create what can be best described as a Phoney War, rather than looking at how we can remove conflict between motor vehicles and vulnerable road users, whether on bike or foot, are at best deeply unhelpful – and at worst, by fostering that “us and them” mentality – potentially life-threatening.
And of course, that’s without mentioning the positive benefits of cycling on public health, easing congestion, and reducing toxic emissions that cause death through air pollution and helping combat climate change..